Search Terms:  show off 
Results Returned: 162
Date Range:
3410
Q   !!mG7VJxZNCI  07/10/19 (Wed) 23:10:07   ID: bec565    No. 6989727

You are witnessing the greatest ‘coordinated’ misinformation attack (campaign) ever to be launched against the public – all in an effort to protect themselves from prosecution (public exposure) and regain power (control).
[Attempted removal of the duly elected President of the United States by illegal [manufactured] means]
They believed they could win [con] public support by controlled assets (media, tech, H-wood…).
These controlled assets set out to immediately create division through the use of a pre_designed misinformation campaign.
Groups such as ‘Antifa’ were funded and formed to prevent and/or lessen the appeal for ‘regular’ hard working Americans to gather and express non_narrative viewpoints.
Control of this ‘projected narrative’ depends primarily on their ability to ‘con’ the masses into thinking they are the majority.
The mindset of most: If the majority of people believe ‘this’, than ‘this’ must be more true than ‘that’ [CIA_CLAS 1-99_56_Human_Psych_&_Emotional_Distress_IIED].
Without public support – they are powerless.
We, the People, hold the power.
UNITED WE ARE STRONG.
— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw  off  such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD.
Q
3331
Q   !!mG7VJxZNCI  05/02/19 (Thu) 12:41:23   ID: be77ab    No. 6392995

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oP2F5CM30k
You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD.
May, 2019 – 'kick- off ' 'start' ' offense ense'
Enjoy the  show !
Q
3330
Q   !!mG7VJxZNCI  04/27/19 (Sat) 15:13:33   ID: 661e55    No. 6335740

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-fbi-texts- show -agents-discussed-recruiting-white-house-sources-to-spy-for-bureau/
Chain of Command
Chain of Custody
PENCE' CoS + Wife
FBI 302's
FISA (spy) > Flynn
Will newly discovered evidence (AG Barr - SDNY) FREE FLYNN?
Q
3283
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:45:18   ID: d0eafc    No. 5948229

https://twitter.com/jenwilling711/status/1111367555774664704
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3280
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:41:38   ID: d0eafc    No. 5948102

https://twitter.com/WorldOLuxe/status/1111365734918164486
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3274
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:29:30   ID: d0eafc    No. 5947752

https://twitter.com/Underculture1/status/1111363628354207745
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3273
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:21:16   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947538

https://twitter.com/AGirl397/status/1111360963079520256
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3272
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:19:44   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947488

https://twitter.com/tkjw49419/status/1111361273437057024
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3271
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:16:58   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947414

https://twitter.com/QuirkyFollowsQ/status/1111360759576039426
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3270
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:15:50   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947374

https://twitter.com/NativeSect/status/1111360878383980546
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3269
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:12:27   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947264

https://twitter.com/WorldOLuxe/status/1111359621845958656
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriots!
Q
3268
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:10:29   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947187

https://twitter.com/tkjw49419/status/1111357640708448262
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3267
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:09:32   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947167

https://twitter.com/lindzp1987/status/1111357947328843778
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3266
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:05:19   ID: 2bc015    No. 5947041

https://twitter.com/Danlnieb/status/1111356809988706304
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3265
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 16:03:49   ID: 2bc015    No. 5946995

https://twitter.com/BigChief_MAGA/status/1111356913076314113
Enjoy the  show , VIP Patriot!
Q
3261
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/28/19 (Thu) 15:47:28   ID: e1eebe    No. 5946567

https://twitter.com/barch_anne/status/1111353382323785728
Front row seat, VIP Patriot!
Enjoy the  show .
Q
3212
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/26/19 (Tue) 17:26:03   ID: 6855c3    No. 5909322

Anonymous    03/26/19 (Tue) 17:24:33   ID: 458d46    No. 5909279

>>5909008 (pb)

ADM Rogers would have had lots of access… didn't he turn  off  access to the FBI contractors?

>>5909279
Think Rogers T-Tower meeting (right after SCIF set up in Tower).
Think POTUS campaign leaving T-Tower (base of operations) THE VERY NEXT DAY.
1+1=2
Q
3177
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/25/19 (Mon) 13:35:27   ID: 129d90    No. 5882921

>>5882614 (/pb)
Why didn't POTUS fire [RR] after reporting re:  off er to wear wire?
Why did WHITAKER/BARR retain [RR] to the END?
Who signed  off  on the MUELLER summary report submitted by BARR yesterday?
Who signed fraudulent FISA warrants?
WHO APPOINTED MUELLER AS SPECIAL COUNSEL?
WHO HAS FULL CONTROL?
OPTICS ARE VERY IMPORTANT.
Q
3049
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/13/19 (Wed) 16:52:42   ID: a9fadd    No. 5664805

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/reps-jordan-and-meadows-democrats-dont-care-about-the-integrity-of-the-census
If [D's] FIGHT to protect, safeguard, and promote all illegal immigrants as 'rightful' U.S. citizens who should be afforded all benefits and rights accordingly, WHY THEN WOULD THEY FIGHT TO BLOCK THEM FROM BEING 'COUNTED' AS PART OF THE U.S. CENSUS?
What would the data  show ?
ALL THAT MATTERS IS POWER.
Welcome to the [D] party con.
Q
3014
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/09/19 (Sat) 19:36:19   ID: 0bdfdc    No. 5596872

Anonymous    03/09/19 (Sat) 19:34:25   ID: e97ebf    No. 5596800


20a3c76b44841f41a4016025ac18ce8082e38e12c0563d543f28fc564b443fa3.png

>>5596777

>>5596800
Anons understand now why we've been targeted daily by the FAKE NEWS media and SHILLS?
TODAY THEY ARE LEARNING THE TRUTH.
You have been prepared for what is about to take place.
DARK TO LIGHT.
ENJOY THE  SHOW !
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
3000
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/07/19 (Thu) 23:14:19   ID: 285835    No. 5568867

https://twitter.com/Davidwmiller91/status/1103826672762146817
Keep the calendar up-to-date, Patriot.
Check  off  and log.
Future proves past.
Q
2996
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/07/19 (Thu) 02:07:05   ID: 1e3478    No. 5553154

Anonymous    03/07/19 (Thu) 01:44:15   ID: 54f4cb    No. 5552800

>>5552746
kek, Q.

MZ gets called out and immeadiately panics.

Really nothing to see here… /s

>>5552800
Other articles prior to posts.
Privacy push to cover for past/future 'exposure' issue re: data release non_marketing.
There is no privacy.
There is no way to turn  off  (even through app deletion) their ability to extract info.
How is that possible for a 'supposed' non_gov entity?
Phone co's involved?
Phone_wipe resolve?
Q
2987
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/06/19 (Wed) 23:13:37   ID: 27adf2    No. 5549666


27264602991_ed3a1e66d0_z.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7Gr5oJbM
Never, in our history, has a communications project such as this taken place.
>Return Power Back to the People
>Truth, Transparency, and Equal Justice Under the Law.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (& women) are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men (& Women), deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw  off  such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same." - Reagan
United We Stand.
July 4, 2019.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
2952
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/03/19 (Sun) 20:37:01   ID: 09e18f    No. 5491926

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6009535459001/#sp= show -clips
Q
2938
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  03/03/19 (Sun) 14:55:55   ID: 188b95    No. 5485007

Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question.
What is a FISA warrant/application?
Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV?
If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package?
Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods].
If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?
Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata?
If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)."
Did the dossier provide the 'bulk data' anchor for the spy campaign?
What entity paid for the 'research' dossier?
Opposition candidate?
What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
How do you circumvent US LAW?
What other 'anchors' were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will  show ].
Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign  off '?
Who signed apps 1-4?
Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?
Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?
Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).
How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?
Q
2866
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/22/19 (Fri) 11:57:58   ID: 3ef0f3    No. 5326235


Dt1aJIUVYAA0eF0.jpg

>>5325789 (/pb)
Impossible to defend.
Vietnam trip coming.
Enjoy the  show !
Q
2861
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/22/19 (Fri) 01:49:52   ID: bbf6c5    No. 5320727

Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/22/19 (Fri) 01:47:17   ID: bbf6c5    No. 5320696


IoS1RS6.png

The Deal of a Lifetime?
[Tarmac] meeting not planned according to [LL] & [BC]?
Security reports indicate USSS (sec detail [BC] & FBI (sec detail [LL]) planned for meeting?
SC/[LL] deal presented by BC?
What actions did [JC] take days after?
Less than a week after the tarmac meeting, [JC] announced that the FBI would not recommend an indictment against [HRC]?
Returning to the news?
Q

>>5320696
Just another coincidence we dropped [LL] was  off ered a SC seat on Feb 6th and backed up by POTUS on April 15th.
Enjoy the  show !
Q
2848
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/21/19 (Thu) 15:40:19   ID: 9ec21e    No. 5308483

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226577419.html
Equal justice under the law or RIGGED SYS?
Being a Clinton donor really pays  off !
Q
2843
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/20/19 (Wed) 21:57:03   ID: e7ef6b    No. 5295136

>>5294864 (/pb)
But, you knew that already.
Hence why [AS][SDNY][MW] are attempting to keep the ‘insurance’ scheme ongoing post Mueller.
FEAR.
The fun begins directly after.
Will make the Super Bowl look like a puppy  show .
Q
2787
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/18/19 (Mon) 13:06:26   ID: 38e3f1    No. 5244213

Anonymous    02/18/19 (Mon) 12:53:06   ID: ef30da    No. 5244054


ClipboardImage.png


James Woods @RealJamesWoods

If these actions were directed against a sitting Democrat president, this would be a Watergate level story in the national media by now. Was there an attempt by an acting DAG to weaponize the DOJ in a presidential coup d’etàt?

>>5244054
Attempt to isolate @ FBI/DOJ?
Do you believe the FBI/DOJ acted alone?
If HRC directed & financed the 'dossier' in order to obtain the 'bulk' so-called evidence in order to generate circular news articles (think Yahoo!) and obtain a FISC sign- off , is it reasonable to think that members of the INTEL APPARATUS, STATE DEPT, WH, FOREIGN ALLIES, ETC. were also involved?
THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN OUR KNOWN HISTORY [A NEW WORD FOR 'TREASON' WILL NEED TO BE INVENTED].
Why does HUSSEIN continue to 'proudly' state his administration was 'scandal free'?
Define 'Projection'.
Q
2777
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/17/19 (Sun) 22:03:09   ID: 87d0f5    No. 5234583

Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/17/19 (Sun) 22:02:02   ID: 87d0f5    No. 5234560

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob,  show  me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his  off icial capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q

>>5234560
Disregard any misspelling.
On the move.
Q
2776
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/17/19 (Sun) 22:02:02   ID: 87d0f5    No. 5234560

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob,  show  me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his  off icial capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
2749
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/17/19 (Sun) 02:38:41   ID: 3c93e1    No. 5219223

Anonymous    02/17/19 (Sun) 02:28:12   ID: 551384    No. 5219066


Screenshot_2019-02-16 Statement by the President The White House.png

>>5218933
>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-by-the-president-28/

So all restrictions are  off ?

>>5219066
Trust your President!
Q
2728
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/15/19 (Fri) 05:37:13   ID: b2a9e1    No. 5185770

Anonymous    02/15/19 (Fri) 05:32:48   ID: 934a60    No. 5185721

>>5185619
>https://video.foxnews.com/v/6002418364001/#sp= show -clips
>DOJ held meetings on how to oust President Trump

>Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?

ANONs knew it beforehand.

>>5185721
You have more than you know.
It’s all there.
Future proves past.
Q
2723
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/14/19 (Thu) 23:34:40   ID: 4e1594    No. 5182089

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6002418364001/#sp= show -clips
Truth push.
Q
2698
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/12/19 (Tue) 10:15:43   ID: e78aef    No. 5139798

Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/12/19 (Tue) 10:10:22   ID: e78aef    No. 5139710

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/newly-released-emails- show -fbi-scrambling-to-respond-to-clinton-lawyer-amid-weiner-laptop-review
Shall We Play a Game?
Where are they now?
[Ref: public optics: ‘retired’’left’ refers to ‘fired/forced’]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF "INVESTIGATION"
James Comey, Director – FIRED
Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director - FIRED
Jim Rybicki, Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor – FIRED
James Baker, General Counsel – FIRED
Bill Priestap, Director of Counterintelligence (Strzok’s boss) – FIRED
Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence – FIRED
Lisa Page,  Office ice of General Counsel – FIRED
Mike Kortan, Assistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED
Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to Comey – FIRED
Michael Steinbach - Head of NAT SEC Div - FIRED
John Glacalone – (Predecessor to Steinbach) – Head of NAT SEC Div - FIRED
James Turgal – Assistant Director - FIRED
Greg Bower – Top Congressional Liaison - FIRED
Trisha Anderson – Principle Deputy General Counsel - FIRED
Randy Coleman - Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Div – REMOVED
Coleman Authored:
(1) Anthony Wiener [sic]
(2) [Unrelated]
(3) Wiener [sic] – texting 15 yo – Sexually Explicit
9/26 – Federal SW – IPhone/IPAD/Laptop
Initial analysis of laptop – thousands emails
Hillary Clinton & Foundation
Crime Against Children
Kevin Clinesmith – track & follow
Tashina Gauhar – track & follow
Sally Moyer – track & follow
Jason V. Herring – track & follow
Nothing being done?
FAKE NEWS?
Q

>>5139710
https://twitter.com/FuctupMike/status/1095170275132493824
[Controlled by those who worked for the Clinton's]
They have ZERO control now.
Q
2697
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/12/19 (Tue) 10:10:22   ID: e78aef    No. 5139710

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/newly-released-emails- show -fbi-scrambling-to-respond-to-clinton-lawyer-amid-weiner-laptop-review
Shall We Play a Game?
Where are they now?
[Ref: public optics: ‘retired’’left’ refers to ‘fired/forced’]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF "INVESTIGATION"
James Comey, Director – FIRED
Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director - FIRED
Jim Rybicki, Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor – FIRED
James Baker, General Counsel – FIRED
Bill Priestap, Director of Counterintelligence (Strzok’s boss) – FIRED
Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence – FIRED
Lisa Page,  Office ice of General Counsel – FIRED
Mike Kortan, Assistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED
Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to Comey – FIRED
Michael Steinbach - Head of NAT SEC Div - FIRED
John Glacalone – (Predecessor to Steinbach) – Head of NAT SEC Div - FIRED
James Turgal – Assistant Director - FIRED
Greg Bower – Top Congressional Liaison - FIRED
Trisha Anderson – Principle Deputy General Counsel - FIRED
Randy Coleman - Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Div – REMOVED
Coleman Authored:
(1) Anthony Wiener [sic]
(2) [Unrelated]
(3) Wiener [sic] – texting 15 yo – Sexually Explicit
9/26 – Federal SW – IPhone/IPAD/Laptop
Initial analysis of laptop – thousands emails
Hillary Clinton & Foundation
Crime Against Children
Kevin Clinesmith – track & follow
Tashina Gauhar – track & follow
Sally Moyer – track & follow
Jason V. Herring – track & follow
Nothing being done?
FAKE NEWS?
Q
2695
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/11/19 (Mon) 23:07:05   ID: 72895d    No. 5134370

Anonymous    02/11/19 (Mon) 22:56:46   ID: 2b91c6    No. 5134144


Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 7.51.21 PM.png


34afaaf863584e77256baca2c48bf28c42e9a8bc3e77952cb523b6a4c6ef27e8.png


Not a T-shirt - she laid a square cloth with the Q on it when POTUS came by. PERFECT IDEA when they don't allow Q shirts in.

>>5134144
https://twitter.com/Jvineyard2011/status/1095168967457558528
POTUS "Did they get the clip?"
Yes, Mr. President.
POTUS "Did they catch all the references?"
Yes, Mr. President.
POTUS " Show  me."
Thank you, Mr. John Vineyard.
Thank you, Anons.
(return publicly)
Q
2690
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/11/19 (Mon) 12:50:46   ID: 82893e    No. 5123215

Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/11/19 (Mon) 12:50:22   ID: 82893e    No. 5123210


VoterFraud.jpg

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no  show  vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q


Drr-_hrXcAEV77j.jpg

>>5123210
2689
Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  02/11/19 (Mon) 12:50:22   ID: 82893e    No. 5123210


VoterFraud.jpg

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no  show  vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q